On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 03:38:44PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 9/13/2021 09:54, Matthew Brost wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:51:27PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
>
> On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
>
> Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if
On 9/13/2021 09:54, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:51:27PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if the engine PM reference
is taken while all contexts are pinned. By not calling
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:51:27PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if the engine PM reference
> > is taken while all contexts are pinned. By not calling
> > switch_to_kernel_context we save on issuing a
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:51:27PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if the engine PM reference
> > is taken while all contexts are pinned. By not calling
> > switch_to_kernel_context we save on issuing a
On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if the engine PM reference
is taken while all contexts are pinned. By not calling
switch_to_kernel_context we save on issuing a request to the engine.
I thought the intention of the switch_to_kernel was to
Calling switch_to_kernel_context isn't needed if the engine PM reference
is taken while all contexts are pinned. By not calling
switch_to_kernel_context we save on issuing a request to the engine.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter)
- Add FIXME comment about pushing switch_to_kernel_context to backend
