On 09.07.2012 16:43, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Christian K?nig
> wrote:
>> It's not critical, but the current code isn't
>> 100% correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133
>>
It's not critical, but the current code isn't
100% correct.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133 ++-
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
> It's not critical, but the current code isn't
> 100% correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 77
It's not critical, but the current code isn't
100% correct.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133 ++-
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
It's not critical, but the current code isn't
100% correct.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133
++-
1 file
On 09.07.2012 16:43, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
It's not critical, but the current code isn't
100% correct.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 133