On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:26:36AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:25 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 15.05.19 um 10:58 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > >> To allow a smooth transition from pinning
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:25 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 15.05.19 um 10:58 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> To allow a smooth transition from pinning buffer objects to dynamic
> >> invalidation we first start to cache the
Am 15.05.19 um 10:58 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
To allow a smooth transition from pinning buffer objects to dynamic
invalidation we first start to cache the sg_table for an attachment.
v2: keep closer to the DRM implementation
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> To allow a smooth transition from pinning buffer objects to dynamic
> invalidation we first start to cache the sg_table for an attachment.
>
> v2: keep closer to the DRM implementation
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
i915
To allow a smooth transition from pinning buffer objects to dynamic
invalidation we first start to cache the sg_table for an attachment.
v2: keep closer to the DRM implementation
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 27 +--