Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: drop driver owner assignment

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 10:47, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > On 24/04/2024 11:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:27:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Core in mipi_dsi_driver_register() already sets the .owner, so driver > >> does not need to. > >> > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: drop driver owner assignment

Hi Dmitry, On 24/04/2024 11:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:27:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: Core in mipi_dsi_driver_register() already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski ---

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: drop driver owner assignment

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:27:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Core in mipi_dsi_driver_register() already sets the .owner, so driver > does not need to. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: drop driver owner assignment

On 30/03/2024 21:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Core in mipi_dsi_driver_register() already sets the .owner, so driver > does not need to. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- It has been almost a month. Any comments on this patchset? Best regards, Krzysztof

[PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: drop driver owner assignment

Core in mipi_dsi_driver_register() already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chipone-icn6211.c