[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-20 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michel D?nzer wrote: >> From: Michel D?nzer >> >> This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a >> horizontal resolution that is a multiple of 128, and only the leftmost column >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote: From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a horizontal resolution that is

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
Ignore the 1/2, there's no second patch. -- Earthling Michel D?nzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel D?nzer This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a horizontal resolution that is a multiple of 128, and only the leftmost column of the cursor was (supposed to be) visible at the right edge of that display. The solution is to

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michel D?nzer wrote: > From: Michel D?nzer > > This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a > horizontal resolution that is a multiple of 128, and only the leftmost column > of the cursor was (supposed to be) visible at the right edge

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a horizontal resolution that is a multiple of 128, and only the leftmost column of the cursor was (supposed to be) visible at the right edge of that display. The solution is to move

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
Ignore the 1/2, there's no second patch. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Try harder to avoid HW cursor ending on a multiple of 128 columns.

2012-07-17 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote: From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com This could previously fail if either of the enabled displays was using a horizontal resolution that is a multiple of 128, and only the leftmost column of the cursor was