On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> blank. Add a bool to
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:24:40AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 18. 08. 20, 9:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> > > framebuffer the optimization added by commit
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:24:40AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 18. 08. 20, 9:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> > framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> > skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change")
On 18. 08. 20, 9:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> blank. Add a bool to force an update to
When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
blank. Add a bool to force an update to fix that.
v2: use drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset()
