Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
Please send everything together because otherwise it's not clear why we need this. Andrey On 2022-09-08 11:09, James Zhu wrote: Yes, it is for NPI design. I will send out patches for review soon. Thanks! James On 2022-09-08 11:05 a.m., Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: So this is the real need of

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread James Zhu
Yes, it  is for NPI design. I will send out patches for review soon. Thanks! James On 2022-09-08 11:05 a.m., Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: So this is the real need of this patch-set, but this explanation doesn't appear anywhere in the description. It's always good to add a short 0 RFC patch which

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
So this is the real need of this patch-set, but this explanation doesn't appear anywhere in the description. It's always good to add a short 0 RFC patch which describes the intention of the patchset if the code is not self explanatory. And I still don't understand the need - i don't see

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread James Zhu
To save lines is not the purpose. Also I want to use entity->sched_list to track ring which is used in this ctx in amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity Best Regards! James On 2022-09-08 10:38 a.m., Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: I guess it's an option but i don't really see what's the added value  ? You saved

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
I guess it's an option but i don't really see what's the added value  ? You saved a few lines in this patch but added a few lines in another. In total seems to me no to much difference ? Andrey On 2022-09-08 10:17, James Zhu wrote: Hi Andrey Basically this entire patch set are derived from

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread James Zhu
Hi Andrey Basically this entire patch set are derived from patch [3/4]: entity->sched_list = num_sched_list > 1 ? sched_list : NULL; I think no special reason to treat single and multiple schedule list here. Best Regards! James On 2022-09-08 10:08 a.m., Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: What's the

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
What's the reason for this entire patch set ? Andrey On 2022-09-07 16:57, James Zhu wrote: drm_sched_pick_best returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** instead of struct drm_gpu_scheduler * Signed-off-by: James Zhu --- include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-08 Thread Christian König
Hui? That's certainly not correct. Christian. Am 07.09.22 um 22:57 schrieb James Zhu: drm_sched_pick_best returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** instead of struct drm_gpu_scheduler * Signed-off-by: James Zhu --- include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[PATCH 1/4] drm/sched: returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** for drm_sched_pick_best

2022-09-07 Thread James Zhu
drm_sched_pick_best returns struct drm_gpu_scheduler ** instead of struct drm_gpu_scheduler * Signed-off-by: James Zhu --- include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h index