On 2023-10-04 08:10:35 [-0400], Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> I did some digging, and it seems like the intention of that patch was to
> fix the following splat:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1062 at
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c:71
> dc_assert_fp_enabled+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu]
>
On 10/3/23 15:53, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2023-09-21 10:15, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
This is a revert of the commit mentioned below while it is not wrong, as
in the kernel will explode, having migrate_disable() here it is
complete waste of resources.
Additionally commit message is
On 2023-10-03 15:53:41 [-0400], Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2023-09-21 10:15, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > This is a revert of the commit mentioned below while it is not wrong, as
> > in the kernel will explode, having migrate_disable() here it is
> > complete waste of resources.
> >
> >
On 2023-09-21 10:15, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a revert of the commit mentioned below while it is not wrong, as
> in the kernel will explode, having migrate_disable() here it is
> complete waste of resources.
>
> Additionally commit message is plain wrong the review tag does not
This is a revert of the commit mentioned below while it is not wrong, as
in the kernel will explode, having migrate_disable() here it is
complete waste of resources.
Additionally commit message is plain wrong the review tag does not make
it any better. The migrate_disable() interface has a fat
