On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:41:05PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
> > drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
> > is purely an
Hi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
> drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
> is purely an implementation detail of gem.
Yepp. Maybe we could even remove them as
Hi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
is purely an implementation detail of gem.
Yepp. Maybe we could even
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:41:05PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
is
No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
is purely an implementation detail of gem.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 2 +-
include/drm/drmP.h| 1 -
2 files
No one outside of drm should use this, the official interfaces are
drm_gem_handle_create and drm_gem_handle_delete. The handle refcounting
is purely an implementation detail of gem.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 2 +-
include/drm/drmP.h
