On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:09AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
> gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 24.04.23 um 09:33 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > Hi Cyril,
> >
> > CC DT
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
Was a proper solution for the regression the initial mail in this thread
is about ever found? Doesn't look like it for here, but maybe I'm
missing something.
Reminder, the
On 4/24/23 11:07, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 24.04.23 um 09:33 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Cyril,
CC DT
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical
Hi
Am 24.04.23 um 09:33 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Cyril,
CC DT
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
gone: the updated
Hi Cyril,
CC DT
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
> gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
>
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
"of-display.N" as required.
This means that offb no longer finds the expected
