Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/lima: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 02:55, Qiang Yu wrote: > > It looks like lima_clk_init will have the same problem if devm_clk_get > returns -EPROBE_DEFER. Indeed, although I did not experience it but it is valid point. I'll send v2. Best regards, Krzysztof ___

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/lima: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

It looks like lima_clk_init will have the same problem if devm_clk_get returns -EPROBE_DEFER. Regards, Qiang On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get > resources) as an error. For example getting a

[PATCH 2/3] drm/lima: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get resources) as an error. For example getting a regulator causes three unneeded error messages: lima 1300.gpu: failed to get regulator: -517 lima 1300.gpu: regulator init fail -517 lima 1300.gpu: Fatal error