On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:16:48 +
Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Something on arm[64] must be including , but things fail
> > to compile on sparc64. Make sure this header is included explicitly
> > so this driver can be compile-tested on
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:31:23 +
Steven Price wrote:
> On 04/03/2024 09:08, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Something on arm[64] must be including , but things fail
> > to compile on sparc64. Make sure this header is included explicitly
> > so this driver can be compile-tested on all supported
On 04/03/2024 09:08, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Something on arm[64] must be including , but things fail
> to compile on sparc64. Make sure this header is included explicitly
> so this driver can be compile-tested on all supported architectures.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot
> Closes:
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Something on arm[64] must be including , but things fail
> to compile on sparc64. Make sure this header is included explicitly
> so this driver can be compile-tested on all supported architectures.
Is compilation on sparc64
Something on arm[64] must be including , but things fail
to compile on sparc64. Make sure this header is included explicitly
so this driver can be compile-tested on all supported architectures.
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Closes:
