[PATCH 2/3] drm/vma_manage: Drop has_offset

2015-10-23 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's racy, creating mmap offsets is a slowpath, so better to remove it > to avoid drivers doing broken things. > > The only user is i915, and it's ok there because everything (well > almost) is protected by dev->struct_mutex in i915-gem.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/vma_manage: Drop has_offset

2015-10-23 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Daniel, [auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Update-GEM-refcounting-docs/20151023-011317 config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-10230205 (att

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/vma_manage: Drop has_offset

2015-10-23 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Daniel, [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Update-GEM-refcounting-docs/20151023-011317 config: i386-randconfig-s1-201542 (attached

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/vma_manage: Drop has_offset

2015-10-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:47:49AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > [auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base, > please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Updat

[PATCH 2/3] drm/vma_manage: Drop has_offset

2015-10-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's racy, creating mmap offsets is a slowpath, so better to remove it to avoid drivers doing broken things. The only user is i915, and it's ok there because everything (well almost) is protected by dev->struct_mutex in i915-gem. While at it add a note in the create_mmap_offset kerneldoc that dri