On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:07:19PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > > index
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:07:19PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > index d5ece7a9a403..f94405d43fd1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > +++
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index d5ece7a9a403..f94405d43fd1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline void
Hi,
On 11/20/20 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index d5ece7a9a403..f94405d43fd1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask)
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/20/20 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > index d5ece7a9a403..f94405d43fd1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > @@
Extracted from slab.h, which seems to have the most complete version
including the correct might_sleep() check. Roll it out to slob.c.
Motivated by a discussion with Paul about possibly changing call_rcu
behaviour to allocate memory, but only roughly every 500th call.
There are a lot fewer
