On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 4:48 PM Chunfeng Yun wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:53 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > All the headers for phy-mtk-mipi-{dsi,dsi-mt8173,dsi-mt8183}.c were
> > included from phy-mtk-mipi-dsi.h, but this isn't optimal: in order to
> > increase readability
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:53 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> All the headers for phy-mtk-mipi-{dsi,dsi-mt8173,dsi-mt8183}.c were
> included from phy-mtk-mipi-dsi.h, but this isn't optimal: in order to
> increase readability and sensibly reduce build times, the inclusions
> should be done
All the headers for phy-mtk-mipi-{dsi,dsi-mt8173,dsi-mt8183}.c were
included from phy-mtk-mipi-dsi.h, but this isn't optimal: in order to
increase readability and sensibly reduce build times, the inclusions
should be done per-file, also avoiding to include unused headers and
should not be
