Now that the kernel provides DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(), drop the internal
implementation and use the kernel one.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman at suse.de>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino at arm.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index 40580794e23d..b8a5fa15ca24 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -190,12 +190,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);

 static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device 
*dev);

-/* This implements DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST but avoids 64 bit division */
-static u64 div_round64(u64 dividend, u32 divisor)
-{
-       return div_u64(dividend + (divisor / 2), divisor);
-}
-
 /*
  * Try detecting repeating patterns by keeping track of the last 8
  * intervals, and checking if the standard deviation of that set
@@ -317,7 +311,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct 
cpuidle_device *dev)
         * operands are 32 bits.
         * Make sure to round up for half microseconds.
         */
-       data->predicted_us = div_round64((uint64_t)data->next_timer_us *
+       data->predicted_us = 
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)data->next_timer_us *
                                         data->correction_factor[data->bucket],
                                         RESOLUTION * DECAY);

-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to