Plus extend the kerneldoc a bit to explain how this should be used.
With the previous patch to drop the force restore the main user of
this function is not emphasis on the "I hold the internal master lock
already" aspect, so rename the function to match.
Suggested by Noralf.
Cc: Noralf Trønnes
R
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:16 PM Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Den 29.01.2020 09.24, skrev Daniel Vetter:
> > Plus extend the kerneldoc a bit to explain how this should be used.
> > With the previous patch to drop the force restore the main user of
> > this function is not emphasis on the "I hold the int
Den 29.01.2020 09.24, skrev Daniel Vetter:
> Plus extend the kerneldoc a bit to explain how this should be used.
> With the previous patch to drop the force restore the main user of
> this function is not emphasis on the "I hold the internal master lock
The _not_ confuses me, the emphasis is now
Plus extend the kerneldoc a bit to explain how this should be used.
With the previous patch to drop the force restore the main user of
this function is not emphasis on the "I hold the internal master lock
already" aspect, so rename the function to match.
Suggested by Noralf.
Cc: Noralf Trønnes
S
