On środa, 25 stycznia 2017 12:24:35 CET Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Krzysztof Nowicki
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Is this patch still being considered for pulling in?
> >
> > Recently I've been fighting with a HP UltraSlim docking
On 2017-01-25 05:46 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Harry Wentland
> wrote:
>> You mean rebase dal/dc on drm-next with these patches?
>
> This is a core MST fix, so it would be good to get upstream for all drivers.
>
Ignore my previous
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> You mean rebase dal/dc on drm-next with these patches?
This is a core MST fix, so it would be good to get upstream for all drivers.
>
> I'll see if I find some time today or tomorrow to do that. We'll
> probably
You mean rebase dal/dc on drm-next with these patches?
I'll see if I find some time today or tomorrow to do that. We'll
probably need that anyways for our atomic rework.
Do you still rebase amd-staging on drm-next?
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=amd-staging-drm-next
looks a few
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Krzysztof Nowicki
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On środa, 15 czerwca 2016 14:14:01 CET wrote:
>> On 15 June 2016 at 13:49, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> > Excuse me for top posting.
>> >
>> > So I finally got back to this patch, still don't like it.
Hi,
On środa, 15 czerwca 2016 14:14:01 CET wrote:
> On 15 June 2016 at 13:49, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Excuse me for top posting.
> >
> > So I finally got back to this patch, still don't like it.
> >
> > Apart from the doing 3 things in once which is just annoying, current
> > userspace for
On 15 June 2016 at 13:49, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Excuse me for top posting.
>
> So I finally got back to this patch, still don't like it.
>
> Apart from the doing 3 things in once which is just annoying, current
> userspace for tiled monitors
> relies on the behaviour that the cached edids are
MST display ?
>
> Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lysenko, Mykola
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:09 PM
> To: Dave Airlie; Wentland, Harry
> Cc: dri-devel
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp/mst: change MST detection scheme
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Att
: dri-devel
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp/mst: change MST detection scheme
Hi Dave,
it seems to be missed call to
drm_mode_connector_set_tile_property(port->connector);
here:
> + } else if (port->pdt == DP_PEER_DEVICE_SST_SINK ||
> +
connector);
> + }
I will test with tile display to see if it solves the issue.
Thanks,
Mykola
-Original Message-
From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:46 PM
To: Wentland, Harry
Cc: dri-devel ; Lysenko, Mykola
Su
}
I will test with tile display to see if it solves the issue.
Thanks,
Mykola
-Original Message-
From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:46 PM
To: Wentland, Harry
Cc: dri-devel ; Lysenko, Mykola
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp/mst: change MST
On 23 January 2016 at 08:07, Harry Wentland wrote:
> From: Mykola Lysenko
>
> 1. Get edid for all connected MST displays, not only on logical ports,
>in the same thread as MST topology detection is done:
> There are displays that have branches inside w/o logical ports.
> So in case
From: Mykola Lysenko
1. Get edid for all connected MST displays, not only on logical ports,
in the same thread as MST topology detection is done:
There are displays that have branches inside w/o logical ports.
So in case another SST display connected
13 matches
Mail list logo