Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/msm/dpu: Always flush the slave INTF on the CTL

2024-04-23 Thread Abhinav Kumar
On 4/16/2024 4:57 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: As we can clearly see in a downstream kernel [1], flushing the slave INTF is skipped /only if/ the PPSPLIT topology is active. However, when DPU was originally submitted to mainline PPSPLIT was no longer part of it (seems to have been ripped out

Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/msm/dpu: Always flush the slave INTF on the CTL

2024-04-17 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 02:57, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > As we can clearly see in a downstream kernel [1], flushing the slave INTF > is skipped /only if/ the PPSPLIT topology is active. > > However, when DPU was originally submitted to mainline PPSPLIT was no > longer part of it (seems to have

[PATCH 3/7] drm/msm/dpu: Always flush the slave INTF on the CTL

2024-04-16 Thread Marijn Suijten
As we can clearly see in a downstream kernel [1], flushing the slave INTF is skipped /only if/ the PPSPLIT topology is active. However, when DPU was originally submitted to mainline PPSPLIT was no longer part of it (seems to have been ripped out before submission), but this clause was incorrectly