On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Are all of those codepaths really inaccessible in non-legacy drm
> drivers? I didn't try to fully unravel all the ioctls and such, but
> it seems like userspace could add bufs and map them. Since the mtrr
> code isn't very robust
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
-#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
-static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
- return
Hi
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>>> -#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
>>> -static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
>>> -{
>>> - return drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_USE_MTRR);
>>> -}
>>> -#else
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
>> -#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
>> -static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
>> -{
>> - return drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_USE_MTRR);
>> -}
>> -#else
>> -#define drm_core_has_MTRR(dev) (0)
>> -#endif
>> -
>
> That was
Hi
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
> and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
> additional checks.
>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> ---
>
The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
additional checks.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 13 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c | 11 +--
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann
>>> wrote:
> -#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
> -static inline int
The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
additional checks.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 13 +
Hi
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
additional checks.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net
Signed-off-by: Daniel
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
-#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
-static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
- return drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_USE_MTRR);
-}
-#else
-#define drm_core_has_MTRR(dev) (0)
-#endif
-
That was
Hi
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
-#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
-static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
- return drm_core_check_feature(dev,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
-#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
-static inline int
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Are all of those codepaths really inaccessible in non-legacy drm
drivers? I didn't try to fully unravel all the ioctls and such, but
it seems like userspace could add bufs and map them. Since the mtrr
code isn't very
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann
14 matches
Mail list logo
