Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/dsi: fix DSC for the bonded DSI case

2023-11-15 Thread Marijn Suijten
On 2023-11-14 14:00:19, Jonathan Marek wrote: > On 11/14/23 1:28 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On what hardware have you been testing this? Dmitry and I have a stack of > > patches to resolve support for Active CTL programming on newer hardware (DPU > > 5.0+ IIRC), where a single CTL is

Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/dsi: fix DSC for the bonded DSI case

2023-11-14 Thread Jonathan Marek
On 11/14/23 1:28 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: On what hardware have you been testing this? Dmitry and I have a stack of patches to resolve support for Active CTL programming on newer hardware (DPU 5.0+ IIRC), where a single CTL is responsible for programming multiple INTF and DSC blocks as used in

Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/dsi: fix DSC for the bonded DSI case

2023-11-14 Thread Marijn Suijten
On what hardware have you been testing this? Dmitry and I have a stack of patches to resolve support for Active CTL programming on newer hardware (DPU 5.0+ IIRC), where a single CTL is responsible for programming multiple INTF and DSC blocks as used in bonded DSI. On 2023-11-14 12:42:16,

[PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/dsi: fix DSC for the bonded DSI case

2023-11-14 Thread Jonathan Marek
For the bonded DSI case, DSC pic_width and timing calculations should use the width of a single panel instead of the total combined width. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h | 3 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c| 20 +++-