Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/uc: Split firmware table validation to a separate function

2023-04-19 Thread John Harrison
On 4/18/2023 16:14, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote: On 4/14/2023 5:57 PM, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison The validation of the firmware table was being done inside the code for scanning the table for the next available firmware blob. Which is unnecessary. Potentially, it

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/uc: Split firmware table validation to a separate function

2023-04-18 Thread Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
On 4/14/2023 5:57 PM, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison The validation of the firmware table was being done inside the code for scanning the table for the next available firmware blob. Which is unnecessary. Potentially, it should be a selftest. But either way, the first

[PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/uc: Split firmware table validation to a separate function

2023-04-14 Thread John . C . Harrison
From: John Harrison The validation of the firmware table was being done inside the code for scanning the table for the next available firmware blob. Which is unnecessary. Potentially, it should be a selftest. But either way, the first step is pulling it out into a separate function that can be