On 29.05.2014 19:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>>
>>> We could rename the off/on to pre/post_modeset if you like, but then
>>> someone gets to audit all the other drivers. That someone isn't
>>> going to be me.
>>
>> I appreciate your caution wrt
On 28.05.2014 20:19, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:12:54PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>>
>> Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
>>
>> On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
When the pre/post-mo
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
>> We could rename the off/on to pre/post_modeset if you like, but then
>> someone gets to audit all the other drivers. That someone isn't
>> going to be me.
>
> I appreciate your caution wrt other drivers, but I'm worried that having
> a sec
Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>>
>> When the pre/post-modeset hooks were originally added, it worked like
>> this: the pre-modeset hook enabled the vblank interrupt, which update
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:12:54PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
>
> On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >>
> >> When the pre/post-modeset hooks were originally added, it worked
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:56:20AM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:03:35PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrj?l?
> >
> > Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
> > drm_vblank_off() and drm_vblank_on() cal
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We can kill o
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:03:35PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
wrote:
> From: Ville Syrj?l?
>
> Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
> drm_vblank_off() and drm_vblank_on() calls, and sprinkle the appropriate
> drm_vblank_on() calls to the .crtc_enabl
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:58:26 +0900
Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We can kill of the
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > >
> > > We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
> > > there s
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
> > there simply to make drm_vblank_get() fail during a modeset.
>
> Actuall
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
> there simply to make drm_vblank_get() fail during a modeset.
Actually, their original purpose was to keep the DRM vblank counter
consistent acr
From: Ville Syrj?l?
Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
drm_vblank_off() and drm_vblank_on() calls, and sprinkle the appropriate
drm_vblank_on() calls to the .crtc_enable() hooks. At this time I kept
the off calls in their current position, and added the on call
13 matches
Mail list logo
