Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8550

2023-01-04 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 12:11, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 04/01/2023 10:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On 04/01/2023 11:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >> SM8550 use a 4nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions > >> with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle > >> 4nm variant

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8550

2023-01-04 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 04/01/2023 10:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On 04/01/2023 11:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: SM8550 use a 4nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 4nm variant inside the common 5+7nm driver. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong ---  

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8550

2023-01-04 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 04/01/2023 11:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: SM8550 use a 4nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 4nm variant inside the common 5+7nm driver. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 4

[PATCH 5/6] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8550

2023-01-04 Thread Neil Armstrong
SM8550 use a 4nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 4nm variant inside the common 5+7nm driver. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c |