On 17-02-24, 16:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Due to a long-standing issue in driver core, drivers may not probe defer
> after having registered child devices to avoid triggering a probe
> deferral loop (see fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of
> -EPROBE_DEFER")).
>
> This could potentially
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 17:03, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> Due to a long-standing issue in driver core, drivers may not probe defer
> after having registered child devices to avoid triggering a probe
> deferral loop (see fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of
> -EPROBE_DEFER")).
>
> This could
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:02:27PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Due to a long-standing issue in driver core, drivers may not probe defer
> after having registered child devices to avoid triggering a probe
> deferral loop (see fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of
> -EPROBE_DEFER")).
>
>
On 17/02/2024 16:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
Due to a long-standing issue in driver core, drivers may not probe defer
after having registered child devices to avoid triggering a probe
deferral loop (see fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of
-EPROBE_DEFER")).
This could potentially also
Due to a long-standing issue in driver core, drivers may not probe defer
after having registered child devices to avoid triggering a probe
deferral loop (see fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of
-EPROBE_DEFER")).
This could potentially also trigger a bug in the DRM bridge
implementation
