Den 02.12.2022 12.50, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>
>>>
>>> You use drm_gem_fb_vmap() in the other places but here you access the
>>> object directly (and in the next hunk), but again not so important since
>>> it goes away in a later patch.
>>
>> I'll update this patch to use drm_gem_fb_vmap()
Den 02.12.2022 12.27, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 25.11.22 um 18:39 schrieb Noralf Trønnes:
>>
>>
>> Den 21.11.2022 11.45, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Move the vmap/vunmap blocks from the inner fb_dirty helpers into the
>>> MIPI DBI update helpers. The function calls can result in
You use drm_gem_fb_vmap() in the other places but here you access the
object directly (and in the next hunk), but again not so important since
it goes away in a later patch.
I'll update this patch to use drm_gem_fb_vmap() consistently.
And after looking at the impact and churn, I rather go
Hi
Am 25.11.22 um 18:39 schrieb Noralf Trønnes:
Den 21.11.2022 11.45, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
Move the vmap/vunmap blocks from the inner fb_dirty helpers into the
MIPI DBI update helpers. The function calls can result in waiting and/or
processing overhead. Reduce the penalties by executing
Den 21.11.2022 11.45, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
> Move the vmap/vunmap blocks from the inner fb_dirty helpers into the
> MIPI DBI update helpers. The function calls can result in waiting and/or
> processing overhead. Reduce the penalties by executing the functions once
> in the outer-most
Move the vmap/vunmap blocks from the inner fb_dirty helpers into the
MIPI DBI update helpers. The function calls can result in waiting and/or
processing overhead. Reduce the penalties by executing the functions once
in the outer-most function of the pipe update.
This change also prepares for MIPI
