Quoting Daniel Vetter (2021-05-20 12:58:52)
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:25:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > @@ -1306,7 +1322,8 @@ static int msm_pdev_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > if (ret)
> > goto fail;
> >
> > - ret =
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:25:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The device lists are poorly ordered when the component device code is
> used. This is because component_master_add_with_match() returns 0
> regardless of component devices calling component_add() first. It can
> really only fail if an
The device lists are poorly ordered when the component device code is
used. This is because component_master_add_with_match() returns 0
regardless of component devices calling component_add() first. It can
really only fail if an allocation fails, in which case everything is
going bad and we're out
