RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify lots of things

2020-02-03 Thread Shankar, Uma
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville > Syrjälä > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 5:19 PM > To: Alex Deucher > Cc: Intel Graphics Development ; Maling list > - DRI > developers > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify

Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify lots of things

2020-01-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 05:38:15PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:03 PM Ville Syrjala > wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Let's try to make a lot more stuff const in the edid parser. > > > > The "downside" is that we can no longer mangle the EDID in the > >

Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify lots of things

2020-01-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:03 PM Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Let's try to make a lot more stuff const in the edid parser. > > The "downside" is that we can no longer mangle the EDID in the > middle of the parsing to apply quirks (drm_mode_detailed()). > I don't really think

[PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify lots of things

2020-01-24 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Let's try to make a lot more stuff const in the edid parser. The "downside" is that we can no longer mangle the EDID in the middle of the parsing to apply quirks (drm_mode_detailed()). I don't really think mangling the blob itself is such a great idea anyway so I won't miss