Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: panel: nv3052c: correct spi_device_id for RG35XX panel

2024-10-25 Thread Hironori KIKUCHI
Hello, Unfortunately, I've found that the recent Anbernic RG35XX Plus uses a new panel labeled `YLM-LBV0345001H-V2`, which is not compatible with the `WL-355608-A8` in its initialization sequence. Thus, the name `rg35xx-plus-panel` is no longer a unique identifier for the panel. I think it should

Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: panel: nv3052c: correct spi_device_id for RG35XX panel

2024-10-20 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:37:41 +1300, Ryan Walklin wrote: > The Anbernic RG35XX devices use an SPI LCD panel from an unknown OEM, > with an NV3052C driver chip. > > As discussed previously, the integrating vendor and device name are > preferred instead of the OEM serial. A previous patch corrected t

Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: panel: nv3052c: correct spi_device_id for RG35XX panel

2024-10-20 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 09:37:41PM +1300, Ryan Walklin wrote: > The Anbernic RG35XX devices use an SPI LCD panel from an unknown OEM, > with an NV3052C driver chip. > > As discussed previously, the integrating vendor and device name are > preferred instead of the OEM serial. A previous patch corre

[PATCH RESEND] drm: panel: nv3052c: correct spi_device_id for RG35XX panel

2024-10-20 Thread Ryan Walklin
The Anbernic RG35XX devices use an SPI LCD panel from an unknown OEM, with an NV3052C driver chip. As discussed previously, the integrating vendor and device name are preferred instead of the OEM serial. A previous patch corrected the device tree binding and of_device_id in the NV3052C driver, how