On 29/04/2021 18:27, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 28.04.21 16:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 4/28/21 11:24 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct
On 28.04.21 16:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/28/21 11:24 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
[...]
+static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct device *dev = >dev;
+ enum sn65dsi83_model model;
+ struct sn65dsi83 *ctx;
+ int
On 4/28/21 11:49 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
[...]
I just saw the note in the header of the driver that says that single
link mode is unsupported for the DSI84.
I have hardware with a single link display and if I set
ctx->lvds_dual_link = false it works just fine.
How is this supposed to be
On 4/28/21 11:24 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
[...]
+static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+struct device *dev = >dev;
+enum sn65dsi83_model model;
+struct sn65dsi83 *ctx;
+int ret;
+
+ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 2:54 PM Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2021 11:26, Loic Poulain wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 10:13, Frieder Schrempf
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28.04.21 09:51, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> >>> On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83
On 28/04/2021 11:26, Loic Poulain wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 10:13, Frieder Schrempf
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28.04.21 09:51, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>>> On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 10:13, Frieder Schrempf
wrote:
>
> On 28.04.21 09:51, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> > On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> >> and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> >>
On 28.04.21 09:51, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
but easy to add.
The driver operates the chip
Hi Marek,
SN65DSI84 also supports single-link LVDS. We have quite a few customers using
SN65DSI84 on Variscite SOMs with low resolution single-channel LVDS panels. I
think having a DTS binding to indicate the number of links used by SN65DSI84 is
more flexible than forcing dual-link mode on
On 22/04/2021 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
but easy to add.
The driver operates the
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
but easy to add.
The driver operates the chip via I2C bus. Currently the LVDS clock
12 matches
Mail list logo
