On 8/10/23 08:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 10.08.23 um 00:17 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
With the current mental model every GPU scheduler instance represents
a single HW ring, while every entity represents a software queue feeding
into one or multiple GPU scheduler instances and hence into one o
On 8/10/23 06:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
With the current mental model every GPU scheduler instance represents
a single HW ring, while every entity represents a software queue feeding
into one or multiple GPU scheduler instances and
Am 10.08.23 um 00:17 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
With the current mental model every GPU scheduler instance represents
a single HW ring, while every entity represents a software queue feeding
into one or multiple GPU scheduler instances and hence into one or
multiple HW rings.
This does not really
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> With the current mental model every GPU scheduler instance represents
> a single HW ring, while every entity represents a software queue feeding
> into one or multiple GPU scheduler instances and hence into one or
> multiple HW rin
With the current mental model every GPU scheduler instance represents
a single HW ring, while every entity represents a software queue feeding
into one or multiple GPU scheduler instances and hence into one or
multiple HW rings.
This does not really scale with firmware schedulers feeding the actua