On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:26 AM Christopher James Halse Rogers
wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2018 7:07:01 pm NZDT, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 December 2018 4:35:37 am AEDT, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Christopher,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 03:37, Christopher
On 18 December 2018 7:07:01 pm NZDT, Christopher James Halse Rogers
wrote:
>On 18 December 2018 4:35:37 am AEDT, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>>Hi Christopher,
>>
>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 03:37, Christopher James Halse Rogers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We can't use drmSetMaster to query whether or not a drm fd
On 18 December 2018 4:35:37 am AEDT, Emil Velikov
wrote:
>Hi Christopher,
>
>On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 03:37, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> wrote:
>>
>> We can't use drmSetMaster to query whether or not a drm fd is master
>> because it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, even if the fd *is* a master fd.
>>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:38 PM Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 03:37, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> wrote:
> >
> > We can't use drmSetMaster to query whether or not a drm fd is master
> > because it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, even if the fd *is* a master fd.
>
Hi Christopher,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 03:37, Christopher James Halse Rogers
wrote:
>
> We can't use drmSetMaster to query whether or not a drm fd is master
> because it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, even if the fd *is* a master fd.
>
Can you please mention the exact use case here? You mentioned it
We can't use drmSetMaster to query whether or not a drm fd is master
because it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, even if the fd *is* a master fd.
Pick DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATTACHMODE as a long-deprecated ioctl that is
DRM_MASTER but not DRM_ROOT_ONLY as the probe by which we can detect
whether or not the fd is
