On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:02 +
Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced
> "master/slave" with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following
> on to Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology
> for users of I2C_ALGOBIT
On 4/30/2024 1:29 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:38:02PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1],
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:38:02PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> I2C_ALGOBIT
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the
