Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support

2022-03-09 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Sam, Quoting Sam Ravnborg (2022-02-06 15:44:02) > From: Rob Clark > > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way. > > v3: > - Rebased and dropped the ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp() patch >as this was solved in a

Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support

2022-02-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Douglas, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:34:34PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:44 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating > > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better

Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support

2022-02-07 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:34:34PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:44 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating > > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way. > > > > v3:

Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support

2022-02-07 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:44 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > From: Rob Clark > > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way. > > v3: > - Rebased and dropped the ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp() patch >as this was solved

[PATCH v1 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add NO_CONNECTOR support

2022-02-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
From: Rob Clark Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way. v3: - Rebased and dropped the ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp() patch as this was solved in a different way (Sam) v2: - Remove error return with NO_CONNECTOR