Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 24/05/2023 13:30, Andi Shyti wrote: Hi again, finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the top commit. OK, sorry! 1) IGT is not merged yet. if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though. can

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 24/05/2023 13:19, Andi Shyti wrote: Hi Tvrtko, finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the top commit. OK, sorry! 1) IGT is not merged yet. if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi again, > > > finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) > > > > I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the > > top commit. > > OK, sorry! > > > 1) > > IGT is not merged yet. > > if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though. can we at least

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi Tvrtko, > > finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) > > I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the > top commit. OK, sorry! > 1) > IGT is not merged yet. if igt is merged without the kernel it would fail, though. > 2) > The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 24/05/2023 12:56, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/05/2023 09:37, Andi Shyti wrote: Hi Fei, finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the top commit. 1) IGT is not merged yet. 2) The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-24 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 23/05/2023 09:37, Andi Shyti wrote: Hi Fei, finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) I had to revert this (uapi commit only) by force pushing, luckily it was the top commit. 1) IGT is not merged yet. 2) The tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h part of the patch was not removed.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-23 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi Fei, finally... pushed in drm-intel-gt-next! :) Andi On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:11:01PM -0700, fei.y...@intel.com wrote: > From: Fei Yang > > This series introduce a new extension for GEM_CREATE, > 1. end support for set caching ioctl [PATCH 1/2] > 2. add set_pat extension for gem_create

[PATCH v10 0/2] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

2023-05-18 Thread fei . yang
From: Fei Yang This series introduce a new extension for GEM_CREATE, 1. end support for set caching ioctl [PATCH 1/2] 2. add set_pat extension for gem_create [PATCH 2/2] v2: drop one patch that was merged separately commit 341ad0e8e254 ("drm/i915/mtl: Add PTE encode function") v3: rebased