On 3/7/23 21:25, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Not really a problem with this patchset, but having such branches looks
>> like a bug in the driver's GEM design. Whatever your GEM object needs or
>> does, it should be hidden in the implementation. Why is virtio doing this?
> There is another "VRAM"
On 3/7/23 13:42, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 05.03.23 um 23:10 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> [...]
>> *bo_ptr = bo;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
>> index 4c09e313bebc..3f21512ff153 100644
>> ---
Hi
Am 05.03.23 um 23:10 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
[...]
*bo_ptr = bo;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
index 4c09e313bebc..3f21512ff153 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
+++
Support generic drm-shmem memory shrinker and add new madvise IOCTL to
the VirtIO-GPU driver. BO cache manager of Mesa driver will mark BOs as
"don't need" using the new IOCTL to let shrinker purge the marked BOs on
OOM, the shrinker will also evict unpurgeable shmem BOs from memory if
guest
