Re: [PATCH v2] dma-contiguous: define proper name for global cma region

2023-08-10 Thread Pintu Agarwal
Hi, On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 23:04, Pintu Agarwal wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:39:04PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > So, forgive me, I've not had a chance to look into this, but my > > > recollection was "reserved" is

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-contiguous: define proper name for global cma region

2023-08-09 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:04 AM Pintu Agarwal wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 23:04, Pintu Agarwal wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:39:04PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > > So, forgive me, I've not ha

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-contiguous: define proper name for global cma region

2023-08-04 Thread Pintu Agarwal
Hi, On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:39:04PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > So, forgive me, I've not had a chance to look into this, but my > > recollection was "reserved" is the name we see on x86, but other names > > are possibly provided via t

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-contiguous: define proper name for global cma region

2023-08-02 Thread Pintu Agarwal
Hi Christoph, Thank you so much for your review and comments. On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 16:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi Pintu, > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 08:05:15AM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > The current global cma region name defined as "reserved" > > which is misleading, creates confusi

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-contiguous: define proper name for global cma region

2023-08-01 Thread John Stultz
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:18 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:42:42PM +0530, Pintu Agarwal wrote: > > > I agree that reserved is not a very useful name. Unfortuately the > > > name of the region leaks to userspace through cma_heap. > > > > > > So I think we need prep pat