On 8/23/23 16:51, Alex Deucher wrote:
@Mahfooz, Hamza
can you respin with the NULL check?
sure.
Alex
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:25 AM Christian König
wrote:
Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza
@Mahfooz, Hamza
can you respin with the NULL check?
Alex
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:25 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
> >
> > On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
> >>> fbcon requires that
Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement _framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag).
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement _framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement _framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many
On 8/15/2023 12:26, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
fbcon requires that we implement _framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic
fbcon requires that we implement _framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement
