On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Yep, Dave's patches fix the issue on their own so this is only going to be
> needed for 4.6.
Ok, so not the first one that only needs to be applied to stable kernels.
For that to work you need to explain that this is the most minimal fi
no problem, I'll let you know when they're ready
On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 16:53 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> >
> > Yep, Dave's patches fix the issue on their own so this is only going to be
> > needed for 4.6.
> Ok, so not the first one
Yep, Dave's patches fix the issue on their own so this is only going to be
needed for 4.6.
On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 08:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:39:56PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> >
> > If an MST device is disconnected while the machine is suspended, the
> > number of co
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:39:56PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> If an MST device is disconnected while the machine is suspended, the
> number of connectors will change as well after we call
> intel_dp_mst_resume(). This means that any previous atomic state we had
> before suspending is no longer valid, si
If an MST device is disconnected while the machine is suspended, the
number of connectors will change as well after we call
intel_dp_mst_resume(). This means that any previous atomic state we had
before suspending is no longer valid, since it'll still be pointing to
missing connectors. We need to c
