Re: [PATCH v2] drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no EDID

2022-05-13 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:32 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:14 AM Thomas Zimmermann > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Am 10.05.22 um 22:51 schrieb Douglas Anderson: > > > If we're unable to read the EDID for a display because it's corrupt / > > > bogus / invalid

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no EDID

2022-05-11 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:14 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi > > Am 10.05.22 um 22:51 schrieb Douglas Anderson: > > If we're unable to read the EDID for a display because it's corrupt / > > bogus / invalid then we'll add a set of standard modes for the > > display. When userspace looks

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no EDID

2022-05-11 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 10.05.22 um 22:51 schrieb Douglas Anderson: If we're unable to read the EDID for a display because it's corrupt / bogus / invalid then we'll add a set of standard modes for the display. When userspace looks at these modes it doesn't really have a good concept for which mode to pick and

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no EDID

2022-05-10 Thread Abhinav Kumar
On 5/10/2022 1:51 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: If we're unable to read the EDID for a display because it's corrupt / bogus / invalid then we'll add a set of standard modes for the display. When userspace looks at these modes it doesn't really have a good concept for which mode to pick and

[PATCH v2] drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no EDID

2022-05-10 Thread Douglas Anderson
If we're unable to read the EDID for a display because it's corrupt / bogus / invalid then we'll add a set of standard modes for the display. When userspace looks at these modes it doesn't really have a good concept for which mode to pick and it'll likely pick the highest resolution one by