Re: [PATCH v2 00/65] clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes

2023-03-22 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2023-03-22 03:01:53) > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:55:03PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-11-04 06:17:17) > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a follow-up to a previous series that was printing a warning > > > when a mux has a set_parent

Re: [PATCH v2 00/65] clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes

2023-03-22 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:55:03PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-11-04 06:17:17) > > Hi, > > > > This is a follow-up to a previous series that was printing a warning > > when a mux has a set_parent implementation but is missing > > determine_rate(). > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/65] clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes

2023-03-21 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-11-04 06:17:17) > Hi, > > This is a follow-up to a previous series that was printing a warning > when a mux has a set_parent implementation but is missing > determine_rate(). > > The rationale is that set_parent() is very likely to be useful when > changing the rate,

[PATCH v2 00/65] clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes

2022-11-04 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, This is a follow-up to a previous series that was printing a warning when a mux has a set_parent implementation but is missing determine_rate(). The rationale is that set_parent() is very likely to be useful when changing the rate, but it's determine_rate() that takes the parenting decision.