On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:12:19PM +0100, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 02.05.2024 10:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> > > Up to this day, all fdinfo-based GPU profilers must traverse the entire
> > > /proc directory
Hi Daniel,
On 02.05.2024 10:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> > Up to this day, all fdinfo-based GPU profilers must traverse the entire
> > /proc directory structure to find open DRM clients with fdinfo file
> > descriptors. This is
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Up to this day, all fdinfo-based GPU profilers must traverse the entire
> /proc directory structure to find open DRM clients with fdinfo file
> descriptors. This is inefficient and time-consuming.
>
> This patch adds a new DRM
Up to this day, all fdinfo-based GPU profilers must traverse the entire
/proc directory structure to find open DRM clients with fdinfo file
descriptors. This is inefficient and time-consuming.
This patch adds a new DRM ioctl that allows users to obtain a list of PIDs
for clients who have opened
