On 19/04/24 14:41, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:23PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
>> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
>> drm_device.
>>
>> v2: Directly expose the
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:55:55AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:11:42PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> > In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
> > release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
> > drm_device.
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:23PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
> drm_device.
>
> v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
>
In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
drm_device.
v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
helper (Rodrigo)
Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:11:42PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
> drm_device.
>
> v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
>
In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
drm_device.
v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
helper (Rodrigo)
Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo
Hi Daniel/ Maarten,
Could you please ack this patch.
Thanks,
Aravind.
On 02/04/24 14:28, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
> drm_device.
>
> v2: Directly expose
Hi Thomas,
Could you share your thoughts on this please.
Thanks,
Aravind.
On 02/04/24 14:28, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
> drm_device.
>
> v2: Directly
In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
drm_device.
v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
helper (Rodrigo)
Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Signed-off-by: Aravind
