On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.02.24 um 17:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:50:26PM +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
> > > This new event can be used to trace where a given dma_fence is added
> > > as a dependency of some
Am 16.02.24 um 17:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:50:26PM +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
This new event can be used to trace where a given dma_fence is added
as a dependency of some other work.
How?
What I'd expected here is that you add a dependency chain from
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:50:26PM +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
> This new event can be used to trace where a given dma_fence is added
> as a dependency of some other work.
How?
What I'd expected here is that you add a dependency chain from one fence
to another, but this only has one
Le 14/02/2024 à 16:10, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:00:16 +0100
Christian König wrote:
+DEFINE_EVENT(dma_fence_from, dma_fence_sync_to,
For a single event you should probably use TRACE_EVENT() instead of
declaring a class. A class is only used if you have multiple events
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:00:16 +0100
Christian König wrote:
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(dma_fence_from, dma_fence_sync_to,
>
> For a single event you should probably use TRACE_EVENT() instead of
> declaring a class. A class is only used if you have multiple events with
> the same parameters.
FYI,
Am 13.02.24 um 16:50 schrieb Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer:
This new event can be used to trace where a given dma_fence is added
as a dependency of some other work.
I plan to use it in amdgpu.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 1 +
This new event can be used to trace where a given dma_fence is added
as a dependency of some other work.
I plan to use it in amdgpu.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 1 +
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h | 34
2
