On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:29:00PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Now that the legacy PCI support code doesn't need to write to the
> > drm_driver structure, it can be treated as const through the whole DRM
> > core, unconditional
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Now that the legacy PCI support code doesn't need to write to the
> drm_driver structure, it can be treated as const through the whole DRM
> core, unconditionally. This allows declaring the structure as const in
> all drivers, remo
Now that the legacy PCI support code doesn't need to write to the
drm_driver structure, it can be treated as const through the whole DRM
core, unconditionally. This allows declaring the structure as const in
all drivers, removing one possible attack vector.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
dr
