Hi
Am 06.12.19 um 01:48 schrieb John Donnelly:
>
>
>> On Dec 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, John Donnelly
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello Sasha and Thomas ,
>>
>>
>> This particular patch has failed on one class of servers that has a slightly
>> different Sun Vendor. ID for the BMC video device:
>>
>> I
> On Dec 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, John Donnelly wrote:
>
>
> Hello Sasha and Thomas ,
>
>
> This particular patch has failed on one class of servers that has a slightly
> different Sun Vendor. ID for the BMC video device:
>
> I will follow up with additional details in the review comments
Hello Sasha and Thomas ,
This particular patch has failed on one class of servers that has a slightly
different Sun Vendor. ID for the BMC video device:
I will follow up with additional details in the review comments for the
original message,.
> On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Sasha
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: 81da87f63a1e ("drm: Replace drm_gem_vram_push_to_system() with
kunmap + unpin").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.3.13.
v5.3.13: Build failed! Errors:
There's at least one system that does not interpret the value of
the device's 'startadd' field correctly, which leads to incorrectly
displayed scanout buffers. Always placing the active scanout buffer
at offset 0 works around the problem.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Reported-by: John
