Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 04:54:28PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:09:15 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
> > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
> > objects aff
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:09:15 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
> state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
> objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
> isn't affected by
On 12/14/23 05:09, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
isn't affected by this update it won't be
The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
isn't affected by this update it won't be part of it.
Thus, it's not truly a "globa
