Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-10-08 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:52:55PM +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Yes, this works: > > Tested-by: Daniel Axtens # arm64, ppc64-qemu-tcg I guess I was assuming you'd pick this up, but that doesn't really make sense because I didn't give you a signed-off-by or

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-26 Thread Daniel Axtens
Hi Bjorn, Yes, this works: Tested-by: Daniel Axtens # arm64, ppc64-qemu-tcg Regards, Daniel > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:27:41PM +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: >> This patch set: >> >> - splits the default display handling out from VGA arbiter, into its >>own file and

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-26 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:27:41PM +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: > This patch set: > > - splits the default display handling out from VGA arbiter, into its >own file and behind its own Kconfig option (and gives the functions >better names). > > - adds extra detection of default devices.

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Hi all, > > The merge window is well over by now - is there anything else I can do > to get this series to a mergeable state? I'm not particularly across the > rules for drm-misc, so please let me know if there are things I

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-25 Thread Daniel Axtens
Hi Bjorn, > But I think trying to split the "default device" part out from the VGA > arbiter ends up being overkill and making things more complicated > instead of simpler. Fair enough. > Would something like the following work for you as well as the powerpc > case? On powerpc, we already use

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-19 Thread Daniel Axtens
Hi all, The merge window is well over by now - is there anything else I can do to get this series to a mergeable state? I'm not particularly across the rules for drm-misc, so please let me know if there are things I need to be doing. Regards, Daniel Daniel Axtens writes: >

[PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-01 Thread Daniel Axtens
This patch set: - splits the default display handling out from VGA arbiter, into its own file and behind its own Kconfig option (and gives the functions better names). - adds extra detection of default devices. To be nominated, the vga arbiter and platform hooks must not have

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-01 Thread Daniel Axtens
Hi Ard, > If we are all in agreement that fixing X is not an option, I think > this is a reasonable approach This did come up in discussion at some earlier point in one of the many spins we've done of this - I don't remember if you brought it up or someone else did - but my concern was this: If

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Split default display handling out from VGA arbiter

2017-09-01 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 1 September 2017 at 08:27, Daniel Axtens wrote: > This patch set: > > - splits the default display handling out from VGA arbiter, into its >own file and behind its own Kconfig option (and gives the functions >better names). > > - adds extra detection of default