Quoting Daniel Latypov (2022-01-20 21:25:03)
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:34 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Daniel Latypov (2022-01-20 13:56:39)
> > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:31 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > KUnit doesn't have hard technical limitations in this regard.
> > >
> > > You
Quoting Daniel Latypov (2022-01-20 13:56:39)
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:31 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > I was thinking this would be more generic so that one file tests clk.c
> > and all the code in there, but I guess there may be config dependencies
> > like CONFIG_OF that we may want to extract
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-01-20 06:34:08)
> Let's test various parts of the rate-related clock API with the kunit
> testing framework.
>
> Cc: kunit-...@googlegroups.com
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> ---
This is great! Thanks for doing this.
>
Let's test various parts of the rate-related clock API with the kunit
testing framework.
Cc: kunit-...@googlegroups.com
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/clk/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/clk/clk-rate-test.c | 278
