On 07/02/2023 02:22, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/3/2023 10:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Split pipe-dependent code from dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() into the
sspp-dependent?
separate function dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(). This is one of
preparational steps to add r_pipe support.
Signed-o
On 07/02/2023 02:22, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/3/2023 10:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Split pipe-dependent code from dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() into the
sspp-dependent?
No, this is really pipe-dependent. It takes dpu_sw_pipe and
dpu_sw_pipe_cfg arguments.
separate function dpu_
On 07/02/2023 02:22, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2/3/2023 10:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Split pipe-dependent code from dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() into the
sspp-dependent?
separate function dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(). This is one of
preparational steps to add r_pipe support.
Signed-o
On 2/3/2023 10:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Split pipe-dependent code from dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() into the
sspp-dependent?
separate function dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(). This is one of
preparational steps to add r_pipe support.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Just a couple o
Split pipe-dependent code from dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() into the
separate function dpu_plane_sspp_update_pipe(). This is one of
preparational steps to add r_pipe support.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 113 --
1 file chan
